40% off ISP proxies 35% off eligible plans Claim deal →
nodemavencoupon.pro
☉ Prices checked: 4 August 2026 ✓ Independent benchmark data cited ★ 8 providers, no filler

The Best NodeMaven Alternatives for Clean Residential Proxy IPs

NodeMaven is a good product with a narrow shape: superb for long-session account work in the US, UK and EU, noticeably weaker for rotating scraping, Asia-Pacific traffic and anything needing compliance paperwork. If any of those limits describe your workload, one of these eight providers will serve you better. Every price, pool figure and benchmark result below is dated and sourced — including the ones that favour NodeMaven.

Diagnosis first

Why Buyers Look for a NodeMaven Alternative

Choosing a replacement sensibly means knowing which specific limitation pushed you to look. In our research these are the five that actually come up, each with a different correct answer:

  • The quality filter does not work for your workflow. Independent testing confirmed NodeMaven's IP Quality Filter only functions with sticky sessions enabled. If you rotate IPs on every request — standard for large-scale scraping — you are paying premium rates for an inactive feature. Go to Decodo or Oxylabs.
  • Google or SERP work is central. Proxyway measured a 52.52% success rate against Google, driven by CAPTCHA challenges, and NodeMaven ships no SERP API. Go to Decodo or Oxylabs, both of which sell dedicated SERP endpoints.
  • Your traffic is Asia-Pacific heavy. 2.18 seconds average latency in India and only 35,265 unique Australian IPs observed. Go to Oxylabs or Bright Data.
  • Price per gigabyte is the binding constraint. NodeMaven lists at roughly $4.25/GB at entry. Go to Webshare for small volumes or Rayobyte for terabyte-scale.
  • Procurement needs certification. NodeMaven publishes no ISO 27001 or SOC 2 and says little about IP sourcing. Go to Decodo (ISO 27001 since January 2026) or Bright Data.
If none of those describe you — if you run long sticky sessions on US, UK or EU targets through an antidetect browser — then honestly, NodeMaven is probably already the right tool, and our NodeMaven review and test method explains why. Switching would be a downgrade.
Side by side

NodeMaven Alternatives Compared

Every figure below was checked on 4 August 2026. Success rates and response times come from Proxyway's independent 2026 market research, which tested infrastructure performance against a content-delivery target across seven gateways — these are not vendor-supplied numbers. Pool sizes are vendor claims and should be read accordingly.

Independent success rate and response time: Proxyway 2026 market research. Pool sizes are vendor-claimed. Prices are list prices without promotional codes, checked 4 August 2026.
ProviderEntry rateVolume ratePool (claimed)Sticky maxKYCSuccess rateResponse
NodeMaven$4.25/GB$2.20/GB30M + ~250K mobile24h–7d (disputed)None99.2–99.5%*0.51–2.18s*
Decodo$3.75/GB$2.00/GB115M + 10M mobile24hRisk-based99.92%0.53s
Oxylabs$6.00/GB$2.50/GB100M–175MConfigurableStrict99.93%0.60s
Webshare~$3.50/GB~$1.50/GB80M (no mobile)5 min–monthlyNone99.28%0.86s
SOAX$5.00/GB$0.85/GB155M + 33M mobile1 hourMandatory99.78%0.89s
IPRoyal$7.00/GB~$1.75/GB32M–64M7 daysLight96.11%1.24s
Bright Data$8.00/GB$2.50/GB150M–400MConfigurableCompanies onlyNot tested 2026
Rayobyte$3.50/GB$0.50/GBNot publishedConfigurableNone98.02%1.86s
NetNut$3.00/GB$1.59/GB85M + 5M mobileConfigurableSales-gated95.28%1.66s

* NodeMaven's figures come from Proxyway's dedicated 2025 review rather than the 2026 cross-provider run, so they are not perfectly like-for-like with the rest of the table. The range reflects regional variation: 0.51s and 99.50% in the UK against 2.18s and 97.98% in India.

Static ISP proxy pricing compared

If you came to NodeMaven for static residential IPs rather than metered bandwidth, this is the more relevant table — and NodeMaven's list price is the least competitive number on this page.

ISP / static residential per-IP list pricing, checked 4 August 2026. Terms and pool sharing differ between providers.
ProviderEntry per-IP priceTermTrafficLocationsNotes
Webshare~$0.30/IPMonthlyMetered by configNamed ISPsCheapest by a wide margin; shared pool
Oxylabs$1.60/IP (10 IPs)MonthlyUnlimited (fair use)22 countriesFalls to $1.20/IP at 500 IPs
Bright Data$1.80/IP sharedMonthly100 GB fair use/IPBroadDedicated tier from $3.50/IP
IPRoyal$2.40/IP (90 days)1–90 daysUnlimited31+ countries24-hour terms available from $1.80
NodeMaven$2.99/IP30 or 90 daysUnlimited7 countriesUDP support; Scamalytics-checked; free IP swap
Rayobyte$5.00/IPMonthly200 GB cap/IP9+ ASNsMost expensive entry; named ASNs

Read plainly: on raw per-IP cost NodeMaven is mid-field at list price and only Rayobyte is more expensive. What NodeMaven adds for the money is genuinely unlimited traffic with no fair-use cap, UDP protocol support, Scamalytics pre-screening, a free IP-pack swap, and a firm replace-or-refund commitment on any IP scoring 70+ for fraud. Whether that justifies paying more than Oxylabs or Bright Data depends on whether the fair-use caps and KYC requirements attached to their cheaper IPs are acceptable to you. Full per-IP maths sits in our NodeMaven pricing explained guide.

Shortcut

Decision Tree: Which Alternative Fits Your Workflow?

🔍

Large-scale rotating scraping

Decodo first — 99.92% success, 0.53s, full scraping API suite, $2.00/GB at a terabyte. Oxylabs if budget allows and reliability outranks cost.

📑

Google / SERP tracking at scale

Decodo or Oxylabs, both with purpose-built SERP APIs. Avoid providers where you must fight CAPTCHAs with raw proxies.

💰

Tightest possible budget

Webshare for small to mid volumes plus a permanent free tier. Rayobyte above a terabyte at ~$0.70/GB, dropping to $0.50/GB above five.

🌏

Asia-Pacific priority

Oxylabs — highest measured success rate and strongest Australian pool. Bright Data as the alternative. Avoid NetNut, explicitly weak in APAC.

🔐

Multi-account & antidetect browsers

Decodo is the closest substitute with 24-hour sticky sessions and ISO 27001. For static identity, compare per-IP ISP pricing rather than bandwidth.

💼

Enterprise procurement

Bright Data for breadth and paperwork, or Decodo for ISO 27001 with far less onboarding friction. Both clear security review more easily than NodeMaven.

🚫

Must avoid KYC entirely

Webshare, Rayobyte or Decodo (risk-based only). Rule out Bright Data, Oxylabs, SOAX and NetNut immediately.

📱

Mobile proxies essential

SOAX bills mobile and residential at one unified rate with 33M+ mobile IPs. Decodo has 10M+. Rule out Webshare — no mobile product at all.

Irregular, bursty usage

IPRoyal — purchased traffic never expires, so bandwidth waits until you need it. NodeMaven's rollover is the next best equivalent.

The eight in detail

Every NodeMaven Alternative, Assessed

1. Decodo — the best all-round NodeMaven alternative

Top pick

Formerly Smartproxy, rebranded in April 2025, and operated by UAB “Data troops” in Vilnius as part of the Tesonet group. Decodo is the provider most NodeMaven buyers should look at first, because it is competitive on the things NodeMaven does well and decisively better on the things NodeMaven does not do at all.

From $3.75/GB$2.00/GB at 1 TB115M+ IPs claimed195+ locationsSticky to 24hISO 27001 (Jan 2026)G2 4.6 / 630+ reviews

Independent testing puts it at the front of the field: Proxyway's 2026 research recorded a 99.92% success rate with a 0.53-second average response time — the fastest of any provider tested — and its pool returned the lowest abuse score of the group at 32.72. Where NodeMaven ships no scraping tooling whatsoever, Decodo offers a Web Scraping API with over 100 pre-built templates and 1,000 free requests, SERP, eCommerce and social endpoints, a Site Unblocker, an AI parser, browser extensions, an MCP server for AI agents, plus n8n and LangChain integrations. It also achieved ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification in January 2026 and co-founded the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative, which matters if your procurement process asks questions.

Best for: high-volume rotating scraping, SERP work, teams that need APIs rather than raw proxies, and anyone whose security review requires certification.
Watch for: monthly plans do not roll unused bandwidth over, unlike NodeMaven — unused data expires. The advertised “from $2/GB” requires a 1,000 GB commitment; the entry tier is $3.75/GB. ASN targeting cannot be combined with other filters. There is a documented pay-as-you-go billing bug producing 407 errors near usage limits, and the PAYG rate is quoted inconsistently across Decodo's own pages ($4.00/GB on the slider, $8.50/GB in a wallet FAQ). Plan upgrades are not pro-rated.

Read our full NodeMaven vs Decodo comparison →

2. Oxylabs — best for reliability and Asia-Pacific

Best performance

The enterprise standard, and the provider that posted the single best independently measured result in 2026: a 99.93% success rate at 0.60 seconds, with the largest verified count of unique IPs in Proxyway's testing. If your calculation is “what fails least” rather than “what costs least”, this is the answer.

PAYG $8.00/GB$6.00/GB at 5 GB$2.50/GB at 1 TBISP from $1.60/IP100M–175M IPs195 countriesG2 4.5 / 164+

Oxylabs is the strongest recommendation for Asia-Pacific workloads specifically — the exact weakness independent testing found in NodeMaven, where India averaged 2.18 seconds. Its Australian pool performed best of any provider in any region in the 2026 run. The product surface is broad: Web Scraper API from $49/month, SERP and eCommerce APIs, Web Unblocker, OxyCopilot AI parsing, and dedicated account managers on every plan including the $30 entry tier. ISP proxies are notably cheaper than NodeMaven's at $1.60/IP for ten, falling to $1.20/IP at 500 — though limited to 22 countries.

Best for: mission-critical reliability, Asia-Pacific coverage, enterprises that want account management, and buyers who need the widest scraper API ecosystem.
Watch for: the most expensive residential pricing in this list at sub-enterprise volumes, and mandatory multi-layer KYC — questionnaire, business registration verification, third-party checks and potentially a live video call with government ID. If you cannot pass business verification, or you need access today, this is a hard stop.

3. Webshare — best budget alternative and the only genuinely free tier

Best value

If cost is the reason you are reading this page, Webshare is the answer. Residential bandwidth commonly runs between $1.40 and $3.50 per gigabyte depending on tier and promotion, static ISP IPs start around $0.30 each — roughly a tenth of NodeMaven's list price — and datacenter proxies start near three cents per IP. Annual billing removes another 30%.

~$3.50/GB entry~$1.50/GB at 1 TBISP ~$0.30/IP80M+ IPs claimed195+ countriesZero KYCTrustpilot 4.1 / 1,172

The free tier is genuinely free and genuinely permanent: 10 datacenter proxies plus 1 GB of residential bandwidth every month, no card, no expiry, no conversion. Nothing else in this category matches that. Onboarding takes under a minute with no verification of any kind, and city-level targeting was added during 2026. Independent testing recorded a respectable 99.28% success rate at 0.86 seconds — behind the premium tier, comfortably ahead of IPRoyal and NetNut.

Best for: budget-constrained buyers, developers validating whether proxies solve their problem at all, cheap static IPs at volume, and anyone who wants zero onboarding friction.
Watch for: no mobile proxies at all — if social platforms are your target, this rules Webshare out immediately. The pool is smaller than the premium providers', support is chat-based with slower turnaround, there is no ASN or ZIP targeting on standard plans, and per-IP ISP pricing can over-provision bursty workloads.

4. SOAX — best unified residential and mobile billing

SOAX's distinguishing feature is commercial rather than technical: one rate covers both residential and mobile IPs, so workflows that interleave the two are not penalised. With 155M+ residential and 33M+ mobile addresses claimed, its mobile pool is far larger than NodeMaven's, and independent testing recorded 99.78% success at 0.89 seconds, with the best US pool success rate in the 2026 run.

Sandbox PAYG $5.00/GBBuilder $200/mo, $3.00/GBTeam $500/mo, $2.20/GB155M + 33M mobile195+ countriesTrial $1.99G2 4.8 / 60

Pricing is plan-based rather than purely per-gigabyte: a $500/month Team plan brings the rate to $2.20/GB, and the $1,500 Scale plan adds ASN and ZIP targeting at $1.50/GB. That structure suits committed mid-market usage and is poor value for occasional buyers.

Best for: ad verification and social monitoring that mixes residential and mobile IPs, teams wanting transparent plan-based pricing, and buyers who value strong geo-targeting.
Watch for: mandatory KYC/KYB across all services since June 2026, including business verification — a genuine dealbreaker for individuals. Sticky sessions cap at one hour, far shorter than NodeMaven, which undermines the long-session account workflows NodeMaven users typically need. Meaningful plans start at $200/month, and there is no free trial.

5. IPRoyal — best for non-expiring bandwidth

IPRoyal's standout feature is that purchased residential traffic never expires. Buy 10 GB and consume it over eight months if that suits you. For irregular or seasonal work this is structurally better than any monthly plan, and better even than NodeMaven's rollover, which still operates on a period-to-period basis.

$7.00/GB at 1 GB$5.25/GB at 10 GB~$1.75/GB bulkISP $2.40/IP (90d)32M–64M claimed195+ countriesG2 4.6 / Trustpilot 3.6

Static ISP IPs are cheaper than NodeMaven's at roughly $2.40 for ninety days across 31+ countries, with 24-hour terms from $1.80 for short campaigns. Residential sticky sessions run up to seven days — matching NodeMaven's most optimistic claim.

Best for: intermittent or seasonal scraping, buyers who hate monthly commitments, and cheap static IPs across more countries than NodeMaven covers.
Watch for: the weakest independently measured performance in this list — 96.11% success at 1.24 seconds in Proxyway's 2026 testing, a decline of roughly 3.45% year on year. Entry pricing is expensive at $7.00/GB for a single gigabyte. Trustpilot sits at 3.6 across roughly 2,640 reviews, notably below its G2 score, with recurring complaints about refund friction and narrow refund windows.

6. Bright Data — best enterprise product breadth

The largest and most comprehensive platform in the category: proxies plus Web Unlocker, a Browser API driving Puppeteer, Playwright and Selenium, SERP API, no-code scraper IDEs, and a dataset marketplace. If your requirement is “one vendor for every data acquisition need”, nothing else comes close.

PAYG $8.00/GB$3.50/GB at 141 GB$2.50/GB at 798 GBISP $1.80/IP shared150M–400M claimed195 countriesG2 4.6 / 239

Static ISP IPs are considerably cheaper than NodeMaven's at $1.80 each for a shared pool of ten, falling to $1.30 at a thousand, with a dedicated tier from $3.50. Compliance documentation is the most thorough in the market.

Watch for the KYC wall. Since 7 July 2026 Bright Data has restricted residential proxies to verified companies only — personal email domains such as Gmail and Outlook are rejected outright, review is performed by humans rather than automation, verification can only begin after you have added real funds, and approval takes up to 48 hours and may involve a video call. Individuals and freelancers are effectively excluded. Datacenter and ISP products, and Web Unlocker, do not carry the same requirement. Bright Data also was not included in Proxyway's 2026 benchmark, so current independent performance data is unavailable.
Best for: funded companies needing maximum product breadth and compliance paperwork, and teams that want a Browser API rather than raw proxies.

7. Rayobyte — cheapest residential bandwidth at scale

For terabyte-scale rotating work, nothing here is close on price. Residential bandwidth runs $3.50/GB at the smallest tier but drops to $2.00/GB above 50 GB, roughly $0.70/GB above one terabyte, and $0.50/GB above five — less than a quarter of NodeMaven's volume rate.

$3.50/GB at 1–49 GB$2.00/GB at 50 GB+$0.50/GB at 5 TB+ISP from $5.00/IPNo KYCTrustpilot 4.1 / 126

It also has a genuine ethical-sourcing story and offers named ASNs on its ISP product, which some antidetect browser users specifically want.

Best for: very high-volume scraping where bandwidth cost dominates and per-request latency does not.
Watch for: the slowest response time of any provider tested in 2026 at 1.86 seconds, with a 98.02% success rate and a declining trend. ISP proxies are the most expensive in this comparison at $5.00/IP — well above NodeMaven — and static residential IPs carry a 200 GB per-IP cap. Trustpilot reviews raise recurring concerns about proxy quality and support responsiveness.

8. NetNut — direct-ISP architecture for enterprise

NetNut is architecturally distinct: rather than routing through peer-to-peer residential devices, it maintains direct one-hop connections through ISP infrastructure. In principle that means more stable routing and a cleaner sourcing story, which appeals to compliance-sensitive buyers.

Starter $84/mo, 28 GB$3.00/GB entry$1.59/GB at 2 TB85M + 5M mobile195 countriesSales-gated

In practice, the 2026 independent numbers are the weakest of any major provider tested: 95.28% success at 1.66 seconds. Reviewers also describe non-US coverage as thin and explicitly sparse across Asia-Pacific, which removes the main reason a NodeMaven user might switch.

Best for: enterprise buyers who specifically require direct-ISP sourcing for compliance reasons and are buying US-centric traffic.
Watch for: weakest measured performance in this comparison, an $84/month minimum, no free trial (a seven-day refund only after a sales conversation), and onboarding that requires more personal information than most competitors. Not a sensible choice for SMBs or individuals.
The other side

When NodeMaven Is Still the Right Answer

A comparison page that only argues for switching is not research, it is a sales pitch. So here is the honest counter-case, because for one specific buyer profile none of the eight providers above is actually an upgrade.

If you run long sticky sessions on US, UK or EU targets — managing multiple accounts through an antidetect browser, warming profiles, running affiliate or social operations, verifying ads across markets — then NodeMaven's combination is genuinely difficult to replicate. Pre-assignment IP filtering that independent testing confirms cuts Scamalytics fraud scores from 10.94 to 4.4. Sticky sessions materially longer than SOAX's one-hour ceiling. Traffic rollover that Decodo's monthly plans do not offer. Mobile IPs bundled into the same allowance rather than metered separately. A quality guarantee that actually pays out at $1 per verified blacklisted IP, plus up to 10% cashback on consumed traffic. Static ISP IPs with genuinely unlimited traffic, UDP support and no fair-use cap — where Bright Data applies a 100 GB per-IP limit and Rayobyte caps at 200 GB. And no KYC at all, where Bright Data now demands a verified company and Oxylabs may want a video call.

Independent testing supports the regional case too: 0.51 seconds and 99.50% success in the UK, 0.71 seconds and 99.21% in the US. Those are premium-tier numbers. The weaknesses are real but they are specific — Google, Asia-Pacific, heavy pages, rotating sessions, missing APIs. If none of those touch your workflow, switching provider costs you the things NodeMaven is best at to solve problems you do not have.

The remaining objection is price, and it is a fair one at list rates. That is where our partner discount changes the arithmetic: 35% off eligible residential and mobile plans brings the entry rate to roughly $2.76/GB — undercutting Decodo, Oxylabs, SOAX, Bright Data and IPRoyal at comparable tiers — and 40% off ISP proxies takes static IPs to about $1.79 each, below Oxylabs' and Bright Data's entry rates while keeping unlimited traffic and no KYC. Details, scope and effective pricing sit on our NodeMaven coupon code page.

Staying with NodeMaven? Do not pay list price.

AFFMAVEN40 takes 40% off ISP (static residential) proxies. AFFMAVEN35 takes 35% off eligible residential and mobile plans.

AFFMAVEN40 ISP
AFFMAVEN35 eligible plans
Claim the NodeMaven discount →

Codes apply to eligible products only, one per checkout, verified at NodeMaven's live checkout in August 2026. AFFMAVEN40 covers ISP (static residential) proxies; AFFMAVEN35 covers other eligible plans including residential and mobile.

Answers

NodeMaven Alternatives — Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best NodeMaven alternative overall?

There is no single answer, because NodeMaven is a specialist rather than a generalist and the right replacement depends on which of its properties you were relying on. Decodo is the best all-round substitute — it matches NodeMaven on price at most tiers, beat every provider Proxyway tested in 2026 for response time at 0.53 seconds, holds ISO 27001 certification, and adds the scraping and unblocking APIs NodeMaven lacks entirely.

If low cost is the priority, Webshare undercuts almost everyone and offers the only genuinely free tier. If maximum reliability matters more than price, Oxylabs posted the highest independently measured success rate at 99.93%.

Which NodeMaven alternative is cheapest?

For high-volume rotating work, Rayobyte is the clear cost leader at roughly $0.70/GB above one terabyte and $0.50/GB above five. For small and mid-sized workloads, Webshare is cheapest, with residential rates commonly between $1.40 and $3.50 per gigabyte plus a permanent free tier.

Two cautions. Rayobyte recorded the slowest response time in Proxyway's 2026 benchmark at 1.86 seconds, and cheap bandwidth is a false economy if failed requests force retries. Compare cost per successful request, not cost per gigabyte.

Which alternative is best for large-scale web scraping?

Decodo or Oxylabs, and the reasoning is structural rather than marginal. Both ship scraping APIs, SERP endpoints and unblocking products that NodeMaven does not offer at all, so you are not assembling the stack yourself. Both also posted near-perfect infrastructure success rates in 2026 independent testing — 99.92% for Decodo and 99.93% for Oxylabs.

Critically, neither depends on sticky sessions to deliver its quality advantage. NodeMaven's IP Quality Filter switches off during fast rotation, which is precisely the pattern high-volume scraping uses, so scrapers pay premium prices for an inactive feature.

Which alternative is best for Asia-Pacific coverage?

Oxylabs, with Bright Data as the secondary option. Asia-Pacific is NodeMaven's weakest region — independent testing measured 2.18 seconds average latency in India and returned only 35,265 unique Australian IPs. Oxylabs recorded the best overall success rate in 2026 testing at 99.93% with the largest verified unique IP count, and its Australian pool performed strongest of any provider in any region.

Avoid NetNut for APAC specifically: independent reviewers describe its non-US coverage as thin and explicitly sparse across Asia-Pacific.

Which providers do not require KYC?

NodeMaven, Webshare, Rayobyte and Massive operate without mandatory identity verification. Decodo applies risk-based checks that most self-serve customers never trigger, and IPRoyal's verification is light though it can occasionally delay first access.

The strict ones are worth knowing about before you commit budget: Bright Data has required verified companies for residential proxies since July 2026 and rejects personal email addresses outright; Oxylabs runs multi-layer verification that can include a video call; SOAX made KYC/KYB mandatory across all services from June 2026; NetNut gates onboarding behind a sales conversation.

Are there alternatives with a genuinely free trial?

Webshare is the only major provider with a real free tier: 10 datacenter proxies plus 1 GB of residential bandwidth every month, permanently, with no card required and no conversion to a paid plan. Everything else described as “free” in this category involves a card and an automatic upgrade — Decodo and IPRoyal both offer three days and 100 MB on those terms. SOAX charges $1.99 for three days and 400 MB. NodeMaven itself charges $3.50 for 750 MB, which is more bandwidth than any of the card-required trials provide.

Which alternative has the best IP quality?

This is harder to answer than vendors imply, because most quality claims are self-reported. On independently measured abuse scores, Decodo's pool scored lowest — best — at 32.72 in Proxyway's cross-provider testing. NodeMaven's own filtering is genuinely effective when active: independent sampling of 1,000 US IPs showed average Scamalytics fraud scores falling from 10.94 unfiltered to 4.4 with the filter on medium.

The catch remains that NodeMaven's filter requires sticky sessions. For sticky-session account work, NodeMaven's filtered quality is arguably the best in the category; for rotating work, Decodo's baseline pool quality is the more reliable bet.

Which alternative should I choose for multi-account management?

This is the use case where NodeMaven is genuinely hard to replace, because long sticky sessions plus pre-assignment filtering is an unusual combination. If you are leaving anyway, Decodo supports sticky sessions up to 24 hours via a session parameter and holds ISO 27001 certification, making it the closest functional substitute.

For static identity specifically, compare per-IP ISP pricing rather than bandwidth: Webshare is dramatically cheaper at around $0.30/IP, Bright Data starts near $1.80/IP shared, Oxylabs around $1.60/IP at ten IPs, and IPRoyal about $2.40/IP on ninety-day terms — against NodeMaven's $2.99/IP list price.

Is NodeMaven still worth choosing over these alternatives?

For one specific profile, yes: long-session account and identity work in the US, UK or EU, run through an antidetect browser, by someone who values pre-screened IPs and does not want to complete KYC. In that scenario NodeMaven's filtered pool, seven-country static ISP product, traffic rollover, cashback and paying quality guarantee form a package none of the alternatives quite replicate.

Outside that profile the alternatives are usually stronger — cheaper, faster, better certified, or better tooled. We set out the honest case, discount included, in the NodeMaven verdict section above.

What about NodeMaven vs Decodo specifically?

Decodo is the comparison most buyers actually run, since the two overlap heavily on price and target market. In short: Decodo wins on independently measured speed, scraping tooling, compliance certification and pool size; NodeMaven wins on sticky session length, pre-assignment IP filtering, traffic rollover and the fact that unused bandwidth never expires. We break the whole thing down field by field in our dedicated NodeMaven vs Decodo comparison.

Do these providers all offer mobile proxies?

Most, but not all — and the gap matters if social platforms are your target. NodeMaven bundles mobile IPs into the same subscription as residential at no extra cost, which is unusually generous. Decodo, SOAX, IPRoyal, Oxylabs and Bright Data all sell mobile proxies, generally metered separately or at a higher rate. Webshare has no mobile product at all, which is the single biggest caveat on an otherwise excellent budget option.

How often does this comparison get updated?

Proxy pricing and policies change constantly — Bright Data tightened its KYC in July 2026, SOAX introduced mandatory KYC/KYB in June 2026, and Decodo achieved ISO 27001 in January 2026. Every price and policy on this page was checked on 4 August 2026 and we re-verify quarterly, or sooner when a provider announces a material change. Always confirm current pricing on the provider's own checkout before buying.